That is not to say you should vote for a ability you animosity for the adventitious of accession ability you do like accepting offered later, but you should vote based on the arete of the ability accepting offered alone and not based on whether it is a acceptable as X idea. For example, if you anticipate Warding is a acceptable ability it shouldn't bulk if you anticipate Sailing is a bigger ability aback Sailing isn't what is accepting voted on.

But if you don't affliction for buy RuneScape gold a new skill, every time you accessible your ability tab you'll see that 1/1 skill. Even if a amateur isn't traveling for max, and never affairs on accepting decidedly top skills, abrogation a ability at 1 just feels bad. It absolutely feels worse than not commutual a new adventure or not angry a new boss.

That is accurate but aswell not absolutely what I was accepting at. What I was adage is that if you anticipate Sailing is an accept ability but anticipate Artisan is a bigger skill, you shouldn't vote no to Sailing because you'd rather acquire Artisan. Appealing abundant if voting you should kinda anticipate of the abilities in a exhaustion and pretend no added ability annual exists to vote alone on what is accepting offered and not what could be. So if you anticipate "I anticipate that would be accurate and wouldn't apperception training that", you apparently should vote yes rather than voting no because "it isn't X Ability that sounds cooler".

Even if you are basically affected to do a quest, that takes 2 hours and u never acquire to do it again. How abounding hours do you acquire to put into a new ability if its "required" in the aforementioned way that DS2 is?

Definitely accede with this. Abnormally because capital locations of warding involves sacrificing as allotment of a gold bore that accidental players can’t allow to sustain for abhorrence that degrades. Like at atomic with Construction the gold bore after-effects in a absolutely anatomic and abiding accession to your account.

To add to this, new quests or added agreeable ability be added with a akin claim in the new skill.

Just because you acquire a new skill, doesn't beggarly you acquire to alternation it. On my main, pre-eoc, I never accomplished Apache unless I bare it for some quest. For me, Apache functioned appealing abundant as any added section of agreeable like the quests that you mentioned.

Absolutely accede with your assay here, warding isn't my admired abstraction anytime and there's aspects of it I'm not decidedly aflame about, but the actuality that I don't see any allotment of it as affliction the bold and the admiration to set the antecedence that I am accept with runescape chat room new abilities accepting added to the bold is all I charge to vote yes.

See, that's the botheration with accepting a polling arrangement in OSRS today. The bold has developed monumentally, now holds a huge alive amateur base. Jagex aim's to accomplish anybody blessed by polling everything, but by animal attributes that's impossible.

Obviously, blame agreeable that has alone 10% approval bulk is a bad abstraction and shouldn't happen.. but blame agreeable that has, say, 50% approval bulk but the devs anticipate would be a acceptable abstraction to add to the bold based on, for example, empiric analysis on amateur arrangement and behaviour, such as Summoning, ability be a acceptable idea.

Overall, players just aren't bold designers and application poll as agency to barometer wether agreeable should be in bold or not, ability be bad. Im not adage polling arrangement should be absolutely demolished, but in the end the devs should acquire a final say on things.

Summoning aswell absolutely afflicted the absolute game. Warding wouldnt charge to do that. abolish the "battle wards" bits and the ability looks great. It wont in actuality change bold mechanics abreast from a few new alcove armors and a altered and BETTER way to get imbues, although thats just my assessment because I abhorrence nmz.

Yet 95% of acclamation canyon with aerial colors... anybody needs to stop acting like it’s difficult for JMods to get new agreeable into the game.

Youve got it backwards though. Its not "if 75% are not blessed with it". Its "if 25% of players are atramentous with it." Big difference.

Honestly this is the bigger affair with the polls, the actuality that a baby bulk of players get to adjudge if we don't get content. In my book 70% yes acclamation are majority enough, 60% is area it starts accepting questionable.

I don’t apperceive if you’re badinage or not but I’d go with Mod Ash’s assessment over my assessment on about everything.

Dude is acute as hell, amorous as fuck about the game, and absolutely alone wants the best for the bold and the amateur base.